Sexy fully naked females chatting about sex - Define radioactive dating of fossils

Perhaps you have heard the origins debate as being about “human reason” on the one hand, and “the Bible” on the other.

Yes, I have seen “reason” contrasted with “God’s Word” coming from literature.

Perhaps by “reason” they mean “secular philosophy.” (If so, then that is what they should say!

starting about 2.500,000,000 years ago, sedimentary rocks affected by higher amounts of oxygen in the atmosphere, appear red, as though rusted. Fossils include earliest fish, but of types very different from modern ones. signs of the "tentative presence" of plants on land.

Mesoproterozoic from 1,600,000,000 to 1,000,000,000 years ago. Particular importance attaches to occurred around 1,300,000,000 years ago during the late Mesoproterzoic era, after the earth's transition to a more highly oxygenated atmosphere with an ozone screen. Deposits that made Westmorland Green slate formed around 450 million years ago. About 50 million years later, the material was altered by heat and pressure (metamorphosed) to slate, during mountain-building. After many more millions of years, they resembled patches of moss a few centimeters high.

Since the house does not have a true and proper foundation, it is destroyed by the first storm that comes along.

Likewise, those who reason from a secular opinion rather than God’s Word will find their philosophy is easily destroyed by rational analysis.

It creates a “heads I win: tails you lose” type of situation. In fact, the biblical God is the basis for these things (see The Ultimate Proof of Creation). We are supposed to think in a way that is consistent with the character of God – that’s what rationality is.

By contrasting the Bible with “reason”, they are implying that the Bible is unreasonable. And so it is really a shame that many Christians also frame the debate this way.

The Christian should take the Word of God has his or her ultimate standard.

Tags: , ,